Standards List

This document will provide a compendium of resources, ordered by type of disability (including combinations thereof), for engineers to use in the design and development of ADS-DV interfaces, safety systems, and mobility accommodations. These resources will range from documents issued by standards-development organizations, to relevant research reports, and the published results of expert interviews and focus groups conducted with persons with disabilities. It will also consider pre- and pick-up considerations, as well as drop-off and post-drop off considerations.

This paper presents the results of a review of simulation frameworks and standards that could be instrumental to testing and assessment of vehicles with SAE International driving automation Level 4 and 5 automated driving systems (ADSs). A simulation framework or standard describes the object level scenario data (the positions, orientations, and velocities of all the objects in the scene) along with roadway information such that the ADS can be tested in a simulation environment. This open framework could serve as an interface for reading and writing scenario data, allowing for development of a sharable scenario database. Such a database could aid companies, researchers, and developers in the development of ADS and in safely evaluating system performance in simulation.

The Technical report establishes the state-of-the-art of the sets of standards and de facto standards dealing with digital high-definition geographic database specifications, location referencing, positioning and delivery/update protocols. It also analyses the gaps and overlaps between them and drafts recommendations for road actors (operators and equipment manufacturers) for a better integration of these new systems in the road environment but also for map makers and systems developers to integrate the different categories of road equipment and towards the different standardisation bodies (CEN, ISO & ETSI…) and fora, for taking into better consideration the development of future standards.

This document provides the current road equipment suppliers’ visions and their associated short term and medium-term priority deployment scenarios. Potential functional/operational standardization issues enabling a safe interaction of road equipment/infrastructure with automated vehicles in a consistent and interoperable way are identified. This is paving the way for a deeper analysis of standardization actions which are necessary for the deployment of priority short-time applications and use cases.
This deeper analysis will be done at the level of each priority application/use case by identifying existing standards to be used, standards gaps/overlaps and new standards to be developed to support this deployment.
The release 1 is focusing on short-term (2022 to 2027) and medium-term deployment. Further releases will update this initial vision according to short term deployment reality.
The objectives of this document are to:
- Support the TC 226 and its WG12 work through the development of a common vision of the roles and responsibilities of a modern, smart road infrastructure in the context of the automated vehicle deployment from SAE level 1 to SAE level 5. The roles and responsibilities of the road infrastructure are related to its level of intelligence provided by functions and data being managed at its level.
- Promote the road equipment suppliers and partners visions associated to their short-term and medium- term priorities to European SDOs and European Union with the goal of having available relevant, consistent standards sets enabling the identified priority deployment scenarios.
NOTE Road equipment/infrastructure includes the physical reality as its digital representation (digital twin). Both need to present a real time consistency.

Reference the set of standards that are relevant to the assessment of Operational Design Domains (ODD) in the scope of partly and fully connected cooperative automated vehicles (CCAM). Ensure that the identified set of standards retained by the road infrastructure industry is consistent with selected ones
from other main stakeholders involved in the deployment of partly and fully automated mobility.
Guide the road managers / operators / road equipment suppliers to assess and implement the identified set of standards to provide infrastructure support to cooperative automated driving systems (C-ADS, see SAE 13216). The CDA (Cooperative Driving Automation) support from infrastructure is intended to enhance the performance of the Dynamic Driving Task (DDT) and /or to avoid a DDT fallback in case of an ODD (Operational Design Domain) exit. Take into account ISAD services and applicable legal framework in this guide.
Assess the completness and quality of the identified set of standards and propose evolution measures to resolve discovered issues.
Identify new standard developments for further automated vehicles deployment phases (phase 3 and beyond) such as foreseen by the C2C-CC and other main stakeholders’ representative organizations.
Consider the non-technical impacts (societal, economical, legal…etc.) of this standardisation approach.
Several releases of this TR can be foreseen to take into account the dynamic evolution of this domain.

This document gives guidance on ethical considerations with regards to road traffic safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs).
It is applicable to vehicles in level 5 mode according to SAE J3016 in 2022, as part of its report.
This document does not apply to the technical method used to control the decision-making process, nor does it give any guidance on the desired outcomes of those decisions; it gives guidance on ethical aspects for consideration in the design of decision-making process.
This document does not set requirements for the outcomes of ethical decisions, nor does it offer guidance on methodology. It only details aspects of the behaviour of AVs for which considerations may be made by the designer/manufacturer to ensure that key aspects are not overlooked or disregarded.
This document does not offer the technical precision to prescribe the required controls but would, rather, offer a set of “protocol guidelines” that all decision makers regarding automated driving could choose to self-certify against to assure that the desired necessary ethical considerations were addressed during design and effectively controlled.

This document is applicable to road vehicles with automated driving functions. The document specifies the logical interface between in-vehicle environmental perception sensors (for example, radar, lidar, camera, ultrasonic) and the fusion unit which generates a surround model and interprets the scene around the vehicle based on the sensor data. The interface is described in a modular and semantic representation and provides information on object level (for example, potentially moving objects, road objects, static objects) as well as information on feature and detection levels based on sensor technology specific information. Further supportive information is available.
This document does not provide electrical and mechanical interface specifications. Raw data interfaces are also excluded.

This document is applicable to road vehicles with automated driving functions. The document specifies the logical interface between in-vehicle environmental perception sensors (for example, radar, lidar, camera, ultrasonic) and the fusion unit which generates a surround model and interprets the scene around the vehicle based on the sensor data. The interface is described in a modular and semantic representation and provides information on object level (for example, potentially moving objects, road objects, static objects) as well as information on feature and detection levels based on sensor technology specific information. Further supportive information is available.
This document does not provide electrical and mechanical interface specifications. Raw data interfaces are also excluded.

This document is applicable to road vehicles with automated driving functions. The document specifies the logical interface between in-vehicle environmental perception sensors (for example, radar, lidar, camera, ultrasonic) and the fusion unit which generates a surround model and interprets the scene around the vehicle based on the sensor data. The interface is described in a modular and semantic representation and provides information on object level (for example, potentially moving objects, road objects, static objects) as well as information on feature and detection levels based on sensor technology specific information. Further supportive information is available.
This document does not provide electrical and mechanical interface specifications. Raw data interfaces are also excluded.

This document is applicable to road vehicles with automated driving functions. The document specifies the logical interface between in-vehicle environmental perception sensors (for example, radar, lidar, camera, ultrasonic) and the fusion unit which generates a surround model and interprets the scene around the vehicle based on the sensor data. The interface is described in a modular and semantic representation and provides information on object level (for example, potentially moving objects, road objects, static objects) as well as information on feature and detection levels based on sensor technology specific information. Further supportive information is available.
This document does not provide electrical and mechanical interface specifications. Raw data interfaces are also excluded.