List of Strategies & Action plans - Connected Automated Driving

Title	Source	Contributor	Type	Country	Date	Link	Abstract
Task Force on Ethical Aspects of Connected and Automated Driving Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure	Task Force on Ethical Aspects of Connectedand Automated Driving,2nd High Level Structural Dialogue (Frankfurt)	EU	Report		2018-06-01	Link	Read More
The Future of Public Transportation: Embracing Autonomous Mobility	PAVE	EU coallition	White paper		2025-06-16	Link	Autonomous mobility presents a unique and substantial opportunity for public-transport operators and authorities to enact a step-change in their services. By leveraging advanced mobility solutions, public transport can become a truly universal service that enhances connectivity across urban, suburban, and rural areas, reduces reliance on private vehicles, and creates safer and more sustainable communities. Read More
The future of road Transport – Implications of Automated, Connected, Low-carbon and Shared Mobility	Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission	EU	Report		2019-06-18	Link	Read More
UK Connected and Automated Mobility Roadmap to 2030	Zenzic	Member State	Roadmap	United Kingdom	2019-09-01	Link	Read More
White Paper ICV Roadmaps: A Worldwide Perspective	The International Communication and Cooperation Committee of ICV Roadmaps, China Society of Automotive Engineers (CSAE), China Industry Innovation Alliance for Intelligent & Connected Vehicles (CAICV)	Industry	Report	China	2023-05-05	Link	Diverse roadmaps have been released from different countries and regions, led by respective industry organizations as well as governments, playing a crucial role in the alignment among all sectors. To explore the realization path and its corresponding innovation mechanism, starting from exchange and cooperation on these roadmaps, and to lay a solid foundation for further global alignment, the China Society of Automotive Engineers (CSAE) and China Industry Innovation Alliance for Intelligent & Connected Vehicles (CAICV) have established the International Communication and Cooperation Committee of ICV Roadmaps, together with organizations, institutions, and enterprises all around the world, including 5GAA, ACEA, BMW, CAAM, CAERI, CAICT, CATARC, Changan Auto, CICT, DFM, Drive Sweden, ERTICO, ERTRAC & CCAM Partnership, FISITA, GAC Motor, GM, Huawei, KSAE, RIOH, RIRS, SAE International, VDA, Volkswagen, and Zenzic. This white paper outlines the main contents of these diverse ICV roadmaps, drawing on input from the corresponding committee members, synthesizing the respective characteristics and the best practices of these roadmaps. Read More
Who’s in control? Road safety and automation in road traffic	Dutch safety board		Report	Netherlands	2019-11-28	Link	Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are systems that assist the driver in carrying out the primary driving task. ADAS observe the environment using sensors and are able to take over control of speed or driving direction, subject to the responsibility of the person at the wheel. Systems of this kind are also able to warn the driver in situations that the system considers dangerous. Automation in road traffic can help improve road safety, but also engender new road safety risks. On the basis of accident investigations, a literature review and discussions with experts, the Dutch Safety Board has identified a number of types of new risks that are not yet sufficiently recognized or managed. When they are placed on the market, ADAS are not yet fully mature. This means that following permission for use on public roads, they undergo further development. Together with the lack of knowledge among drivers, situations in which drivers fail to understand why the vehicle responds or indeed fails to respond in a particular way can quickly arise. In addition, drivers in vehicles fitted with ADAS play a different role than drivers in conventional cars, namely the role of operator. In all its investigations, the Dutch Safety Board operates a reference framework. This framework lays out the standards with which the various stakeholders are expected to comply, in order to manage safety risks in a given field. Essentially, this reference framework is a question of responsible innovation. Based on this framework, the Dutch Safety Board has identified bottlenecks in terms of design, policy, regulation and supervision, data availability and learning capacity. In addition, the Dutch Safety Board provides in total six recommendations to the automotive manufacturers and the OICA and ACEA umbrella organizations (1), to the BOVAG and RAI Association (1), and to the Dutch Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management (4). Read More